Abstract | الملخص

Police dogs are being used by members of the judicial police (judicial police- law enforcement officers), in the work of inference to detect diverse aspects such as crimes, identifying perpetrators, detecting explosives, drugs or weapons, ammunition, equipment and tools used in committed crimes. In addition, any other important duties in uncovering the truth and serving justice are to maintain security and public law. The use of police dogs is legitimate unless the victim is forced to confess. If this procedure is used to torture or insult him, the case then loses its legitimacy. There are rules and regulations and scientific processes that should be available in police dogs for the purposes of using them in the work of inference, i.e. they should be trained and non-stressful or sick in the case of the ferocity. The identification of the police dogs to the accused person, weapons, tools, or seizures is consort. This is not enough to condemn the victim, other alternative evidence must be provided. On one hand, the confession of the defendant is voluntary and with choice after the accurate identification of the police dog. On the other hand, the confession of the victim shall be valid, when the defendant confesses attack from the police dog.

Authors | المؤلفون

Ibrahim Qatawneh

Keywords | الكلمات الدالة

Use, Police, Dogs, Inference, Penal Evidence.

Full Text | المقال كاملا

References | المراجع