Abstract | الملخص

Adopted legislator Jordanian theory punishment unjustified invented by the French judiciary in order to shut the door of the stall at the speed of completion of the verdicts through the text of Article 282 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which requires the necessity of correct conviction by the Court of Cassation does not undone Manvea so the example of many of comparative legislation that approved provisions similar is that the legislator Jordanian expansion in the realization of this theory to include cases should the veto power may reverse the situation to do some kind of conflict between the texts attributed contrast the role of the court to distinguish between veto power in cases specified in Article 274 and corrected in other cases rulings through the text of Article 282 has helped to get this result disorder plan legislator in terms of the extent of the authority of the Supreme Court over the ruling tinged defect violation of the law and the expansion of the scope sometimes and narrow it other times in the text of articles 274/ 280 / 2.282 . Moreover omission of the legislator for the role carried out by the Court of Cassation from their counterparts in the countries where the transfer by the legislature this text , particularly Egypt has concluded Find the need to limit the application of this article on the case of error only material has been completed to this conclusion after reviewing the position of some of the legislation , districts comparison that I took this theory and those that did not have any consideration .

Authors | المؤلفون

???? ??????? ????????

Keywords | الكلمات الدالة

Unjustified punishmenttheoryand

Full Text | المقال كاملا

References | المراجع